On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
wrote:
> On 2016.02.08 at 09:49 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 01/18/2016 08:52 PM, Kugan wrote:
>> >
>> >2016-01-19 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
>> >
>> > PR middle-end/66726
>> > * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (optimize_range_tests): Handle tcc_comp
> This causes LTO/PGO bootstrap on ppc64le to ICE all over the place:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69781
And a comparison failure with -enable-checking=yes,rtl on x86-64/Linux:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
B
On 12/02/16 17:18, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
On 2016.02.08 at 09:49 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/18/2016 08:52 PM, Kugan wrote:
2016-01-19 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
PR middle-end/66726
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (optimize_range_tests): Handle tcc_compare stmt
whose result
On 2016.02.08 at 09:49 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/18/2016 08:52 PM, Kugan wrote:
> >
> >2016-01-19 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> >
> > PR middle-end/66726
> > * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (optimize_range_tests): Handle tcc_compare stmt
> > whose result is used in PHI.
> > (maybe_optimize_
On 01/18/2016 08:52 PM, Kugan wrote:
Hi,
This is an updated version of
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg02196.html.
Patch to fix PR66726 missed optimization, factor conversion out of
COND_EXPR caused a regression for targets with branch cost greater than
i.e., testcase gcc.dg/pr463
Hi,
This is an updated version of
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg02196.html.
Patch to fix PR66726 missed optimization, factor conversion out of
COND_EXPR caused a regression for targets with branch cost greater than
i.e., testcase gcc.dg/pr46309.c failed for these targets. I posted
