On 15/04/15 15:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
This patch series fixes PR65637.
Currently, ssa-handling code in expand_omp_for_static_chunk is dead and
not exercised by testing.
Ssa-handling code in omp-low.c is only triggered by
pass_parallelize_loops, and that pass doesn't specify a chunk size o
On 18/05/15 14:53, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 15-04-15 15:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
This patch series fixes PR65637.
Currently, ssa-handling code in expand_omp_for_static_chunk is dead
and not
exercised by testing.
Ssa-handling code in omp-low.c is only triggered by
pass_parallelize_loops, and
On 18-05-15 14:53, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 15-04-15 15:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
This patch series fixes PR65637.
Currently, ssa-handling code in expand_omp_for_static_chunk is dead and not
exercised by testing.
Ssa-handling code in omp-low.c is only triggered by pass_parallelize_loops, and
On 15-04-15 15:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
This patch series fixes PR65637.
Currently, ssa-handling code in expand_omp_for_static_chunk is dead and not
exercised by testing.
Ssa-handling code in omp-low.c is only triggered by pass_parallelize_loops, and
that pass doesn't specify a chunk size o
Hi,
This patch series fixes PR65637.
Currently, ssa-handling code in expand_omp_for_static_chunk is dead and not
exercised by testing.
Ssa-handling code in omp-low.c is only triggered by pass_parallelize_loops, and
that pass doesn't specify a chunk size on the GIMPLE_OMP_FOR it constructs, s