On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2017, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
>> On 12/07/2017 04:04 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
>>> For other templates, I ended up writing code to look for
>>> specializations in the hashtables of decl or type specializations.
>>> That's not
On Dec 14, 2017, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/07/2017 04:04 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> For other templates, I ended up writing code to look for
>> specializations in the hashtables of decl or type specializations.
>> That's not exactly efficient, but it gets the job done.
> How inefficient i
wrote:
Handling non-template friends is kind of easy, [...]
Ping?
Ping? (conflicts resolved, patch refreshed and retested)
Ping? (trivial conflicts resolved)
Ping? https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg02112.html
Ping?
Ping? (refreshed, retested)
[PR59319] output friends in debug info
re Oliva wrote:
>>>>>> Handling non-template friends is kind of easy, [...]
>>>>> Ping?
>>>> Ping? (conflicts resolved, patch refreshed and retested)
>>> Ping? (trivial conflicts resolved)
>> Ping? https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-0
On 03/21/2017 12:34 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Jan 27, 2017, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Oct 19, 2016, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Sep 23, 2016, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Aug 30, 2016, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Handling non-template friends is kind of easy, [...]
Regstrapped on x86_64-lin
On Apr 7, 2017, at 11:32 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Mar 21, 2017, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>
>> Ping? https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg02112.html
> Ping?
The Objective-C/C++ parts look fine.
On Mar 21, 2017, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jan 27, 2017, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Oct 19, 2016, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> On Sep 23, 2016, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Aug 30, 2016, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Handling non-template friends is kind of easy, [...]
Ping?
>>> Ping?
On Jan 27, 2017, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2016, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Sep 23, 2016, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> On Aug 30, 2016, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Handling non-template friends is kind of easy, [...]
>>> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu, I'd failed
ion.
>> Ping?
> Ping? (conflicts resolved, patch refreshed and retested)
Ping? (trivial conflicts resolved)
[PR59319] output friends in debug info
From: Alexandre Oliva
Handling non-template friends is kind of easy, but it required a bit
of infrastructure in dwarf2out to avoi
On Sep 23, 2016, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Aug 30, 2016, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> Handling non-template friends is kind of easy, [...]
> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu, I'd failed to
> mention.
> Ping?
Ping? (conflicts resolved, patch refreshed and retested)
Handling
On Aug 30, 2016, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Handling non-template friends is kind of easy, but it required a bit
> of infrastructure in dwarf2out to avoid (i) forcing debug info for
> unused types or functions: DW_TAG_friend DIEs are only emitted if
> their DW_AT_friend DIE is emitted, and (ii) cre
On Aug 26, 2016, Jason Merrill wrote:
> I suppose we can teach dwz to use the maximal set of friends...
*nod*
> This seems unnecessary; there is no semantic difference for a
> particular specialization depending on whether it became a friend
> directly or from its template.
'k, I took that out
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Handling non-template friends is kind of easy, but it required a bit
> of infrastructure in dwarf2out to avoid (i) forcing debug info for
> unused types or functions: DW_TAG_friend DIEs are only emitted if
> their DW_AT_friend DIE is emitte
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 7:25 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Aug 22, 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>> Just throwing in a wrench from the side ... you should do this in
>> dwarf2out_early_finish as late there will be no frontend around anymore.
>
> Thanks for the heads up, I've adjusted my local c
On Aug 22, 2016, Richard Biener wrote:
> Just throwing in a wrench from the side ... you should do this in
> dwarf2out_early_finish as late there will be no frontend around anymore.
Thanks for the heads up, I've adjusted my local copy to do so.
> Yeah, prune_unused_types is still done in dwarf2
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> This is not a finished patch. There are two issues I'd like feedback
> on before a final submission. See them below. First, a general
> description.
>
> Handling non-template friends is kind of easy, but it required a bit
> of infrastruc
This is not a finished patch. There are two issues I'd like feedback
on before a final submission. See them below. First, a general
description.
Handling non-template friends is kind of easy, but it required a bit
of infrastructure in dwarf2out to avoid (i) forcing debug info for
unused types o
17 matches
Mail list logo