On Feb 22, 2023, at 12:04 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> That would change what gets tested with clang, I suppose, but I hope
> that's for the better. I wondered what to do at the #else above, and
> decided to spell it a little differently. Retested on x86_64-linux-gnu
> (trunk) and arm-vxworks
ope
that's for the better. I wondered what to do at the #else above, and
decided to spell it a little differently. Retested on x86_64-linux-gnu
(trunk) and arm-vxworks7r2 (gcc-12), ok to install?
[PR100127] Test for coroutine header in clang-compatible tests
From: Alexandre Oliva
The test i
Hi,
> On 17 Feb 2023, at 06:42, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>
>
> The test is compatible with clang as well as gcc, but ISTM that
> testing for the __clang__ macro is just as potentially error-prone as
> macros that used to be GCC-specific are now defined in compilers that
> aim f
The test is compatible with clang as well as gcc, but ISTM that
testing for the __clang__ macro is just as potentially error-prone as
macros that used to be GCC-specific are now defined in compilers that
aim for GCC compatibility. Use a __has_include feature test instead.
Regstrapped on x86_64-
