On 4/30/20 10:35 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 4/30/20 10:18 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/29/20 2:50 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Jason,
this is the patch you suggested, as I understood it. I kept
finish_nested_require's saving of the (converted)
current_template_parms, becase of the comment ab
On 4/30/20 10:18 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/29/20 2:50 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Jason,
this is the patch you suggested, as I understood it. I kept
finish_nested_require's saving of the (converted)
current_template_parms, becase of the comment about use in diagnostics.
Is this what you m
On 4/29/20 2:50 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Jason,
this is the patch you suggested, as I understood it. I kept
finish_nested_require's saving of the (converted)
current_template_parms, becase of the comment about use in diagnostics.
Is this what you meant?
Yes, this looks fine.
But I don't
On 4/29/20 2:50 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Jason,
this is the patch you suggested, as I understood it. I kept
finish_nested_require's saving of the (converted)
current_template_parms, becase of the comment about use in diagnostics.
this extended test that tries to call the function ices wit
Jason,
this is the patch you suggested, as I understood it. I kept
finish_nested_require's saving of the (converted)
current_template_parms, becase of the comment about use in diagnostics.
Is this what you meant?
boostrapped on x86_64-linux.
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
2020-04-27 Jason Merril
