On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> This fixes the 84962 ICE, which is where we name a member function of an
> anon-struct in the width specifier of a bitfield. The problem is that when
> permissive we allow some of this strangeness. Prior to my lookup changes, we
> only adde
This fixes the 84962 ICE, which is where we name a member function of an
anon-struct in the width specifier of a bitfield. The problem is that
when permissive we allow some of this strangeness. Prior to my lookup
changes, we only added TYPE_FIELDS and we still do that. Trouble is
that now con
