Re: [PR c++/82836] Fixe testcase

2017-11-20 Thread Nathan Sidwell
On 11/19/2017 07:38 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: Ok for mainline, or would you rather make the use of __int128 and __float128 conditional? Patch is good. I'd rather perturb the source itself as little as possible, and I've verified it still ICEs an unfixed x86_64 compiler. thanks, nathan -- Na

Re: [PR c++/82836] Fixe testcase

2017-11-19 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Nathan, > The 82836 testcase fell out of creduce. In c++17 mode it fails horribly > with missing return errors. > > Applying this fix, so it's valid in c++17. It still ICEs (in both 14 and > 17 modes) with the 82836 fix removed. unfortunately, the testcase has several more problems: * It fa

[PR c++/82836] Fixe testcase

2017-11-17 Thread Nathan Sidwell
The 82836 testcase fell out of creduce. In c++17 mode it fails horribly with missing return errors. Applying this fix, so it's valid in c++17. It still ICEs (in both 14 and 17 modes) with the 82836 fix removed. nathan -- Nathan Sidwell 2017-11-17 Nathan Sidwell * g++.dg/pr82836.C: Fix