On October 2, 2017 7:19:19 PM GMT+02:00, Martin Jambor wrote:
>Hi,
>
>the following fixes a thinko in propagate_subaccesses_across_link.
>When we cannot copy over a tree of accesses of RHS to LHS because of
>some conflict, we must mark the whole LHS access (sub-)tree as
>potentially written, even
Hi,
the following fixes a thinko in propagate_subaccesses_across_link.
When we cannot copy over a tree of accesses of RHS to LHS because of
some conflict, we must mark the whole LHS access (sub-)tree as
potentially written, even when the RHS access describing this level is
not, because some of its
