On February 26, 2016 5:15:43 PM GMT+01:00, Martin Jambor
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>my fix for PR 69666 has caused quite a few regressions accross the
>borad where SRA removed a SSA_NAME which however still was in the IL
>(and usually stumbled upon it itself straight away).
>
>The removal path should not be
Hi,
my fix for PR 69666 has caused quite a few regressions accross the
borad where SRA removed a SSA_NAME which however still was in the IL
(and usually stumbled upon it itself straight away).
The removal path should not be executed when there is an SSA_NAME on
the LHS, the code clearly is not re
