Re: [PING v3] Unreviewed GCC-6 patches

2016-08-30 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Jakub Sejdak wrote: > > Ok. > > > > Thanks, > > Richard. > > Sorry for silly question, but does it mean that I have a green light > to commit it to SVN or did you just acknowledge the fact and will take > a look at this later? It was an approval for the backport. > For futu

Re: [PING v3] Unreviewed GCC-6 patches

2016-08-30 Thread Jakub Sejdak
> Ok. > > Thanks, > Richard. Sorry for silly question, but does it mean that I have a green light to commit it to SVN or did you just acknowledge the fact and will take a look at this later? For future: I'm planning to commit it to GCC-5 also later. Do I have to send another patch or maybe it is g

Re: [PING v3] Unreviewed GCC-6 patches

2016-08-30 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Jakub Sejdak wrote: > Hi! > > I would like to ping a couple of unreviewed patches for GCC-6 branch > (they are already in trunk): > > - Backport new Phoenix-RTOS OS name to config.sub > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg01441.html > > - Backport support for Phoe

[PING v3] Unreviewed GCC-6 patches

2016-08-29 Thread Jakub Sejdak
Hi! I would like to ping a couple of unreviewed patches for GCC-6 branch (they are already in trunk): - Backport new Phoenix-RTOS OS name to config.sub https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg01441.html - Backport support for Phoenix-RTOS targets in GCC's config for ARM platform. https://g