On 22-02-16 11:57, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:54:46AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
Following up on your suggestion to implement this during gimplification, I
wrote attached patch.
I'll put it through some openacc testing and add testcases. Is this approach
acceptable for stag
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:54:46AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Following up on your suggestion to implement this during gimplification, I
> wrote attached patch.
>
> I'll put it through some openacc testing and add testcases. Is this approach
> acceptable for stage4?
LGTM.
> gcc/gimplify.c | 8
On 12/02/16 12:10, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 26/01/16 13:49, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 01:38:39PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
Ping^3. ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01089.html )
First of all, I wonder if it wouldn't be far easier to handle these
during
gimplifi
On 26/01/16 13:49, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 01:38:39PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
Ping^3. ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01089.html )
First of all, I wonder if it wouldn't be far easier to handle these during
gimplification rather than during omp expansion
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 01:38:39PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Ping^3. ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01089.html )
First of all, I wonder if it wouldn't be far easier to handle these during
gimplification rather than during omp expansion or during parsing. Inside
kernels, do you
On 18/01/16 15:27, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 24/11/15 13:26, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 09/11/15 21:06, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 09/11/15 16:35, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch series for stage1 trunk adds support to:
- parallelize oacc kernels regions using parloops, and
- map the loops onto the o
