On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 13:39 -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 07/17/2012 05:22 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Sandra Loosemore
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Ping? Original post with patch is here:
> >>
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00319.html
> >
> >
On 07/17/2012 05:22 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
Ping? Original post with patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-06/msg00319.html
Can you update the patch and numbers based on what Bill did for
straight-line strength re
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 10:34 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>
>> 2012-06-05 Sandra Loosemore
>>
>> gcc/
>> * tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (comp_cost): Make complexity field
>> signed.
>> Update comments to indicate this is for addres
On 06/05/2012 10:34 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
2012-06-05 Sandra Loosemore
gcc/
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (comp_cost): Make complexity field signed.
Update comments to indicate this is for addressing mode complexity.
(new_cost): Make signedness of parameters mat
