On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 14:42 -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> Jakub & richi,
>
> This bug also affects GCC 4.8. Is it appropriate to backport this patch
> to the FSF 4.8 branch? I can bootstrap and regtest it there too before
> committing if you think it's ok.
FYI, I tested the patch on the FSF 4.8
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 11:33 +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 07/31/2013 10:01 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > Can you tell me what the status of the following patch that
> > removes the pow() overload from tr1 is? Specifically:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01166.html
> >
Hi,
On 07/31/2013 10:01 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
Hi Fabien,
Can you tell me what the status of the following patch that
removes the pow() overload from tr1 is? Specifically:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01166.html
It seemed to have been approved and you were going to do
Hi Fabien,
Can you tell me what the status of the following patch that
removes the pow() overload from tr1 is? Specifically:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01166.html
It seemed to have been approved and you were going to do some
additional testing before committing the patch l
