Re: [PING] [test case, patch] ICE in Cilk Plus structured block checker

2014-02-11 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:15:00PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Jakub asked me to »please repost just the (hopefully small) trunk patch > alone«, so here we go: > > Consider the following code: > > void baz() > { > bad1: > #pragma omp parallel > goto bad1; > } >

Re: [PING] [test case, patch] ICE in Cilk Plus structured block checker

2014-02-11 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:43:46 +0100, I wrote: > Ping again for test case and rather trivial patch to cure a GCC trunk ICE > in the Cilk Plus structured block checker if both -fcilkplus and -fopenmp > are specified. Jakub asked me to »please repost just the (hopefully small) trunk patch alone«,

[PING] [test case, patch] ICE in Cilk Plus structured block checker

2014-02-11 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! Ping again for test case and rather trivial patch to cure a GCC trunk ICE in the Cilk Plus structured block checker if both -fcilkplus and -fopenmp are specified. Also, I'd still like to know whether the »Generalize diagnose_omp_blocks' structured block logic« patch is fine, too? (If that on