On 12/05/13 13:21, Bill Schmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 12:02 +, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
On 12/04/13 13:08, Bill Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 11:26 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
[snip]
I'm not sure what you're suggesting that he use get_inner_reference on
at this point. At the p
On Thu, 2013-12-05 at 12:02 +, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
> On 12/04/13 13:08, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 11:26 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Bill Schmidt
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 21:35 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> Yufeng
On 12/04/13 13:08, Bill Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 11:26 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 21:35 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Yufeng Zhang wrote:
On 12/03/13 14:20, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 07:13 -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 11:30 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Richard Biener
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Bill Schmidt
>> > > wr
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 07:13 -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 11:30 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Bill Schmidt
> > > wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 21:35 +0100, Richard Biene
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 11:32 +, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
> On 12/04/13 10:30, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Bill Schmidt
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 21:35 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> Y
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 11:30 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Bill Schmidt
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 21:35 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> Yufeng Zhang wrote:
> >>> >On 12/03/13 14:20, Richa
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 11:26 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 21:35 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> Yufeng Zhang wrote:
> >> >On 12/03/13 14:20, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Yufeng Zha
On 12/04/13 10:30, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 21:35 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
Yufeng Zhang wrote:
On 12/03/13 14:20, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Bill Schmidt
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 21:35 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> Yufeng Zhang wrote:
>>> >On 12/03/13 14:20, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> >> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Yufeng Zhang
>>
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 21:35 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> Yufeng Zhang wrote:
>> >On 12/03/13 14:20, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Yufeng Zhang
>> >wrote:
>> >>> On 12/03/13 06:48, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> >>
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 21:57 +, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
> On 12/03/13 20:35, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Yufeng Zhang wrote:
> >> On 12/03/13 14:20, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Yufeng Zhang
> >> wrote:
> On 12/03/13 06:48, Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> > On 12/02/
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 21:35 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> Yufeng Zhang wrote:
> >On 12/03/13 14:20, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Yufeng Zhang
> >wrote:
> >>> On 12/03/13 06:48, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 12/02/13 08:47, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
> >
> > Ping
On 12/03/13 20:35, Richard Biener wrote:
Yufeng Zhang wrote:
On 12/03/13 14:20, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Yufeng Zhang
wrote:
On 12/03/13 06:48, Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/02/13 08:47, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
Ping~
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg03360.ht
Yufeng Zhang wrote:
>On 12/03/13 14:20, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Yufeng Zhang
>wrote:
>>> On 12/03/13 06:48, Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/02/13 08:47, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
>
> Ping~
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg03360.html
On 12/03/13 08:52, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
I still don't like it. It's using the wrong and too expensive tools
to do
stuff. What kind of bases are we ultimately interested in? Browsing
the code it looks like we're having
/* Base expression for the chain of candidates: often, but not
al
On 12/03/13 14:20, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
On 12/03/13 06:48, Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/02/13 08:47, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
Ping~
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg03360.html
Thanks,
Yufeng
On 11/26/13 15:02, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
> On 12/03/13 06:48, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 12/02/13 08:47, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
>>>
>>> Ping~
>>>
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg03360.html
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Yufeng
>>>
>>> On 11/26/13 15:02, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
>
On 12/03/13 06:48, Jeff Law wrote:
On 12/02/13 08:47, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
Ping~
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg03360.html
Thanks,
Yufeng
On 11/26/13 15:02, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
On 11/26/13 12:45, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Yufeng
Zhangwrote:
On 12/02/13 08:47, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
Ping~
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg03360.html
Thanks,
Yufeng
On 11/26/13 15:02, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
On 11/26/13 12:45, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Yufeng
Zhang wrote:
On 11/13/13 20:54, Bill Schmidt wrot
Ping~
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg03360.html
Thanks,
Yufeng
On 11/26/13 15:02, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
On 11/26/13 12:45, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
On 11/13/13 20:54, Bill Schmidt wrote:
The second version of your original pat
Hi Richard,
Can I get an approval or some feedback from you about the patch?
Regards,
Yufeng
On 11/13/13 23:25, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
On 11/13/13 20:54, Bill Schmidt wrote:
Hi Yufeng,
The second version of your original patch is ok with me with the
following changes.
Thanks a lot for the rev
22 matches
Mail list logo