Re: [PING] [PATCH] Avoid atomic for guard acquire when that is expensive

On 11/30/20 3:08 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: Hi, I'd like to ping for this patch: I reviewed it on the 24th: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/560118.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559882.html Thanks Bernd. On 11/22/20 9:05 AM, Bernd Edli

[PING] [PATCH] Avoid atomic for guard acquire when that is expensive

Hi, I'd like to ping for this patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/559882.html Thanks Bernd. On 11/22/20 9:05 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > Hi, > > this avoids the need to use -fno-threadsafe-statics on > arm-none-eabi or working around that problem by supplying > a dum