From: Richard Earnshaw
Sent: 17 October 2012 11:14
To: Greta Yorsh
Cc: GCC Patches; Ramana Radhakrishnan; ni...@redhat.com;
p...@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PING][Patch, ARM] cleanup prologue_use pattern
On 17/10/12 11:08, Greta Yorsh wrote:
Ping!
I've been pondering why this was being
Greta Yorsh
Cc: GCC Patches; Ramana Radhakrishnan; ni...@redhat.com;
p...@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PING][Patch, ARM] cleanup prologue_use pattern
On 17/10/12 11:08, Greta Yorsh wrote:
> Ping!
>
I've been pondering why this was being asked for. As far as I can tell
it's just a
On 17/10/12 11:08, Greta Yorsh wrote:
Ping!
I've been pondering why this was being asked for. As far as I can tell
it's just a naming issue (mention of the epilogue in the prologue).
The right thing to do is to rename the pattern to reflect the dual use
rather than add additional patterns
Ping!
Thanks,
Greta
-Original Message-
From: Greta Yorsh [mailto:greta.yo...@arm.com]
Sent: 10 October 2012 16:14
To: GCC Patches
Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; Richard Earnshaw; ni...@redhat.com;
p...@codesourcery.com
Subject: [Patch, ARM] cleanup prologue_use pattern
The pattern prologue_u
