On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 13:20 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2011, at 5:14 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > Mike and David, I assume the updated patch below is ok for mainline?
>
> Ok. I applied it for you... I'm assuming you don't have write after yet...
> Thanks for all the work.
I do have
On Mar 29, 2011, at 5:14 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> Mike and David, I assume the updated patch below is ok for mainline?
Ok. I applied it for you... I'm assuming you don't have write after yet...
Thanks for all the work.
2011-03-29 Peter Bergner
Dominique d'Humieres
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 07:39 +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> > Ok, slightly updated. How about this? ...
>
> It did not work either at -m64, but the following one seems to work
> (manual testing):
>
> --- /opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c 2011-03-28
> 20:27:57.000
> Ok, slightly updated. How about this? ...
It did not work either at -m64, but the following one seems to work
(manual testing):
--- /opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c2011-03-28
20:27:57.0 +0200
+++ /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c 2011-03-2
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 23:50 +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> > Just guessing at the numbers, does the following patch fix the
> > failures for you?
>
> As I am currently bootstrapping gcc, I cannot regtest right now, but running
> the
> test manually I get 256 at -m32 (I guess this is right) w
> Just guessing at the numbers, does the following patch fix the
> failures for you?
As I am currently bootstrapping gcc, I cannot regtest right now, but running the
test manually I get 256 at -m32 (I guess this is right) while I get 272 at -m64
(so the test will fail).
Dominique
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 20:48 +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> The test gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c already failed on powerpc-apple-darwin9
> before you change with:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c scan-file foo\t(256|264)\tstatic
>
> and is still failing the same way after it.
>
> [karma] f90/bug%
Peter,
The test gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c already failed on powerpc-apple-darwin9
before you change with:
FAIL: gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c scan-file foo\t(256|264)\tstatic
and is still failing the same way after it.
[karma] f90/bug% grep foo stack-usage-1.su
stack-usage-1.c:54:5:foo272 sta
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 10:24 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> > I'd like to ping this test suite patch:
> >
> > [PATCH, testsuite] Update gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c SIZE values for powerpc
> >
> >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00077.html
On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> I'd like to ping this test suite patch:
>
> [PATCH, testsuite] Update gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c SIZE values for powerpc
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00077.html
Normally, I'd prefer the target folks to approve these sorts, b
I'd like to ping this test suite patch:
[PATCH, testsuite] Update gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c SIZE values for powerpc
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00077.html
Peter
11 matches
Mail list logo
