Re: [PATCHv2] Use toplevel configure for GMP and MPFR for gdb

2023-08-10 Thread Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches
Matthias Klose via Gcc-patches writes: > On 10.11.22 20:05, apinski--- via Binutils wrote: >> From: Andrew Pinski >> This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for >> gdb. The only thing is that gdb now requires MPFR for building. >> Before it was a recommended but not required l

Re: [PATCHv2] Use toplevel configure for GMP and MPFR for gdb

2023-08-10 Thread Matthias Klose via Gcc-patches
On 10.11.22 20:05, apinski--- via Binutils wrote: From: Andrew Pinski This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for gdb. The only thing is that gdb now requires MPFR for building. Before it was a recommended but not required library. Also this allows building of GMP and MPFR wit

Re: [PATCHv2] Use toplevel configure for GMP and MPFR for gdb

2022-12-21 Thread Tom Tromey
>> I think it's fine to move forward with this now. >> Thank you again for doing this. Andrew> Just to double check this is an approval? Yes, sorry for being unclear. Tom

Re: [PATCHv2] Use toplevel configure for GMP and MPFR for gdb

2022-12-21 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 12/20/22 20:45, Andrew Pinski wrote: On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:59 AM Tom Tromey wrote: "Andrew" == apinski--- via Gdb-patches writes: Andrew> From: Andrew Pinski Andrew> This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for Andrew> gdb. The only thing is that gdb now requir

Re: [PATCHv2] Use toplevel configure for GMP and MPFR for gdb

2022-12-20 Thread Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 10:59 AM Tom Tromey wrote: > > > "Andrew" == apinski--- via Gdb-patches > > writes: > > Andrew> From: Andrew Pinski > Andrew> This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for > Andrew> gdb. The only thing is that gdb now requires MPFR for building. >

Re: [PATCHv2] Use toplevel configure for GMP and MPFR for gdb

2022-12-20 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Andrew" == apinski--- via Gdb-patches > writes: Andrew> From: Andrew Pinski Andrew> This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for Andrew> gdb. The only thing is that gdb now requires MPFR for building. Andrew> Before it was a recommended but not required library. Andr

Re: [PATCHv2] Use toplevel configure for GMP and MPFR for gdb

2022-11-16 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 11/16/22 09:01, Tom Tromey wrote: "Jeff" == Jeff Law via Gcc-patches writes: This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for gdb. Jeff> If the GDB folks confirm they want this behavior, then the toplevel Jeff> bits are fine. I think we do, but my inclination is to wait unti

Re: [PATCHv2] Use toplevel configure for GMP and MPFR for gdb

2022-11-16 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Jeff" == Jeff Law via Gcc-patches writes: >> This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for >> gdb. Jeff> If the GDB folks confirm they want this behavior, then the toplevel Jeff> bits are fine. I think we do, but my inclination is to wait until after GDB 13 branches. CCin

Re: [PATCHv2] Use toplevel configure for GMP and MPFR for gdb

2022-11-15 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 11/10/22 12:05, apinski--- via Gcc-patches wrote: From: Andrew Pinski This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for gdb. The only thing is that gdb now requires MPFR for building. Before it was a recommended but not required library. Also this allows building of GMP and MPF

[PATCHv2] Use toplevel configure for GMP and MPFR for gdb

2022-11-10 Thread apinski--- via Gcc-patches
From: Andrew Pinski This patch uses the toplevel configure parts for GMP/MPFR for gdb. The only thing is that gdb now requires MPFR for building. Before it was a recommended but not required library. Also this allows building of GMP and MPFR with the toplevel directory just like how it is done fo