Hi Haochen,
on 2024/5/27 15:22, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> Hi Kewen,
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> 在 2024/5/27 11:18, Kewen.Lin 写道:
>> Does this require "This pattern is not allowed to FAIL."?
>>
>> I guess yes? Since if it's decided to go with this pattern
>> expanding, there is no fall back?
>
Hi Kewen,
Thanks for your comments.
在 2024/5/27 11:18, Kewen.Lin 写道:
> Does this require "This pattern is not allowed to FAIL."?
>
> I guess yes? Since if it's decided to go with this pattern
> expanding, there is no fall back?
The builtin is inline folded if the optab doesn't exist on
the
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 4:10 AM HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Gently ping it.
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-May/652170.html
>
> Thanks
> Gui Haochen
>
> 在 2024/5/20 16:15, HAO CHEN GUI 写道:
> > Hi,
> > This patch adds an optab for __builtin_isfinite. The finite check can be
>
Hi,
on 2024/5/20 16:15, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch adds an optab for __builtin_isfinite. The finite check can be
> implemented on rs6000 by a single instruction. It needs an optab to be
> expanded to the certain sequence of instructions.
>
> The subsequent patches will implement t
Hi,
Gently ping it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-May/652170.html
Thanks
Gui Haochen
在 2024/5/20 16:15, HAO CHEN GUI 写道:
> Hi,
> This patch adds an optab for __builtin_isfinite. The finite check can be
> implemented on rs6000 by a single instruction. It needs an optab to be
>
Hi,
This patch adds an optab for __builtin_isfinite. The finite check can be
implemented on rs6000 by a single instruction. It needs an optab to be
expanded to the certain sequence of instructions.
The subsequent patches will implement the expand on rs6000.
Compared to previous version, the
