Re: [PATCH x86] Update PARTIAL_REG_DEPENDENCY tune

2014-10-10 Thread Evgeny Stupachenko
Thanks. I've modified ChangeLog. 2014-10-10 Evgeny Stupachenko * config/i386/x86-tune.def (X86_TUNE_SSE_PARTIAL_REG_DEPENDENCY): Remove m_SILVERMONT and m_INTEL from the tune. On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:58 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Evgeny Stupachenk

Re: [PATCH x86] Update PARTIAL_REG_DEPENDENCY tune

2014-10-10 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote: > Hi, > > We've met several performance issues (up to 15%) on Silvermont caused > by the PARTIAL_REG_DEPENDENCY tuning. > Previously discussed here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57954 > Propose removing Silvermont related t

Re: [PATCH x86] Update PARTIAL_REG_DEPENDENCY tune

2014-10-10 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote: > We've met several performance issues (up to 15%) on Silvermont caused > by the PARTIAL_REG_DEPENDENCY tuning. > Previously discussed here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57954 > Propose removing Silvermont related tune fro

[PATCH x86] Update PARTIAL_REG_DEPENDENCY tune

2014-10-10 Thread Evgeny Stupachenko
Hi, We've met several performance issues (up to 15%) on Silvermont caused by the PARTIAL_REG_DEPENDENCY tuning. Previously discussed here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57954 Propose removing Silvermont related tune from PARTIAL_REG_DEPENDENCY. The patch passed bootstrap, make chec