On 28/10/23 3:56 pm, Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>
>
> On 28/10/23 4:09 am, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/27/23 10:16, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:41:07 +0530
>>> Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>>>
On 25/10/23 2:19 am, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 10/24/23 13:36, rep.dot
On 28/10/23 3:55 pm, Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>
>
> On 27/10/23 10:46 pm, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:41:07 +0530
>> Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/10/23 2:19 am, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On 10/24/23 13:36, rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
> As said, I don't s
On 28/10/23 4:09 am, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
>
> On 10/27/23 10:16, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:41:07 +0530
>> Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>>
>>> On 25/10/23 2:19 am, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On 10/24/23 13:36, rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
> As said, I don't see wh
On 27/10/23 10:46 pm, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:41:07 +0530
> Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>
>> On 25/10/23 2:19 am, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>> On 10/24/23 13:36, rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
As said, I don't see why the below was not cleaned up before the V1
>>>
On 10/27/23 10:16, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:41:07 +0530
Ajit Agarwal wrote:
On 25/10/23 2:19 am, Vineet Gupta wrote:
On 10/24/23 13:36, rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
As said, I don't see why the below was not cleaned up before the V1 submission.
Iff it breaks
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:41:07 +0530
Ajit Agarwal wrote:
> On 25/10/23 2:19 am, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > On 10/24/23 13:36, rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
> >> As said, I don't see why the below was not cleaned up before the V1
> >> submission.
> >> Iff it breaks when manually CSEing, I
On 25/10/23 2:06 am, rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
> On 24 October 2023 09:36:22 CEST, Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>> Hello Bernhard:
>>
>> On 23/10/23 7:40 pm, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:16:18 +0530
>>> Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>>>
Hello All:
Addressed below r
On 25/10/23 2:19 am, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 10/24/23 13:36, rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
>> As said, I don't see why the below was not cleaned up before the V1
>> submission.
>> Iff it breaks when manually CSEing, I'm curious why?
The function below looks identical in v12 of
On 10/24/23 13:36, rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
As said, I don't see why the below was not cleaned up before the V1 submission.
Iff it breaks when manually CSEing, I'm curious why?
The function below looks identical in v12 of the patch.
Why didn't you use common subexpressions?
ba
Using CSE her
On 24 October 2023 09:36:22 CEST, Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>Hello Bernhard:
>
>On 23/10/23 7:40 pm, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:16:18 +0530
>> Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All:
>>>
>>> Addressed below review comments in the version 11 of the patch.
>>> Please review
On 24/10/23 1:10 pm, Ajit Agarwal wrote:
> Hello Vineet:
>
> On 24/10/23 12:02 am, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/22/23 23:46, Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>>> Hello All:
>>>
>>> Addressed below review comments in the version 11 of the patch.
>>> Please review and please let me know if its ok for tr
Hello Vineet:
On 24/10/23 12:02 am, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>
>
> On 10/22/23 23:46, Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>> Hello All:
>>
>> Addressed below review comments in the version 11 of the patch.
>> Please review and please let me know if its ok for trunk.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>> Ajit
>
> Again you are
Hello Bernhard:
On 23/10/23 7:40 pm, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:16:18 +0530
> Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>
>> Hello All:
>>
>> Addressed below review comments in the version 11 of the patch.
>> Please review and please let me know if its ok for trunk.
>
> s/satisified/sat
On 10/22/23 23:46, Ajit Agarwal wrote:
Hello All:
Addressed below review comments in the version 11 of the patch.
Please review and please let me know if its ok for trunk.
Thanks & Regards
Ajit
Again you are not paying attention to prior comments about fixing your
submission practice and
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:16:18 +0530
Ajit Agarwal wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> Addressed below review comments in the version 11 of the patch.
> Please review and please let me know if its ok for trunk.
s/satisified/satisfied/
> > As said, I don't see why the below was not cleaned up before the V1
>
Hello All:
Addressed below review comments in the version 11 of the patch.
Please review and please let me know if its ok for trunk.
Thanks & Regards
Ajit
On 22/10/23 12:56 am, rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
> On 21 October 2023 01:56:16 CEST, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On 10/19/23 23:50, Ajit Agarwa
On 21 October 2023 01:56:16 CEST, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>On 10/19/23 23:50, Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>> Hello All:
>>
>> This version 9 of the patch uses abi interfaces to remove zero and sign
>> extension elimination.
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc-linux-gnu.
>>
>> In this version (version
Hello Vineet:
Thanks for your time and valuable comments.
On 21/10/23 5:26 am, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 10/19/23 23:50, Ajit Agarwal wrote:
>> Hello All:
>>
>> This version 9 of the patch uses abi interfaces to remove zero and sign
>> extension elimination.
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on power
On 10/19/23 23:50, Ajit Agarwal wrote:
Hello All:
This version 9 of the patch uses abi interfaces to remove zero and sign
extension elimination.
Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc-linux-gnu.
In this version (version 9) of the patch following review comments are
incorporated.
a) Removal of
Hello All:
This version 9 of the patch uses abi interfaces to remove zero and sign
extension elimination.
Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc-linux-gnu.
In this version (version 9) of the patch following review comments are
incorporated.
a) Removal of hard code zero_extend and sign_extend i
20 matches
Mail list logo
