Hi Julian,
On 20.12.23 22:29, Julian Brown wrote:
Thanks for review! Here's a new version of the patch which hopefully
addresses this round of comments.
Thanks for the patch. LGTM now.
Tobias
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:41:54 +0100
Tobias Burnus wrote:
On 16.12.23 14:25, Julian Brown wrote:
Hi Tobias,
Thanks for review! Here's a new version of the patch which hopefully
addresses this round of comments.
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:41:54 +0100
Tobias Burnus wrote:
> On 16.12.23 14:25, Julian Brown wrote:
> > --- a/gcc/gimplify.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/gimplify.cc
> > @@ -10107,6 +10114,20 @@ omp
Hi Julian,
On 16.12.23 14:25, Julian Brown wrote:
OpenMP/OpenACC: Reorganise OMP map clause handling in gimplify.cc
This patch has been separated out from the C++ "declare mapper"
support patch. It contains just the gimplify.cc rearrangement
work, mostly moving gimplificati
On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 15:47:51 -0700
Julian Brown wrote:
> This patch has been separated out from the C++ "declare mapper"
> support patch. It contains just the gimplify.cc rearrangement
> work, mostly moving gimplification from gimplify_scan_omp_clauses
> to gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses for map cl
This patch has been separated out from the C++ "declare mapper"
support patch. It contains just the gimplify.cc rearrangement
work, mostly moving gimplification from gimplify_scan_omp_clauses
to gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses for map clauses.
The motivation for doing this was that we don't know if w
