Andrew Stubbs wrote:
Compared to the previous v4 (1/5) posting of this patch:
- The enumeration of the ompx allocators have been moved (again) to 200
(as 100 is already in use by another toolchain vendor and this seems
like a possible source of confusion).
- The "ompx" has also been changed
Compared to the previous v4 (1/5) posting of this patch:
- The enumeration of the ompx allocators have been moved (again) to 200
(as 100 is already in use by another toolchain vendor and this seems
like a possible source of confusion).
- The "ompx" has also been changed to "ompx_gnu" to highlig