Hi!
On 2023-12-06T19:12:25-0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2023, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> As I understand things, ["strub"] cannot be implemented (at the call site)
>> for
>> nvptx, given that the callee's stack is not visible there: PTX is unusual
>> in that the concept of a "standa
On Dec 6, 2023, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> There is also access attribute which speaks directly about individual
> arugments, perhaps you want to drop this one too?
Ah, I've looked a little into it, and now I have a vague recollection of
why I don't mess with them: they only apply to arguments of poi
On Dec 6, 2023, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> I am sorry for sending this late.
No need to be sorry. Thank you very much for taking the time to review
and comment on it.
> I think the ipa changes are generally fine.
Phew :-)
>> +static inline bool
>> +strub_always_inline_p (cgraph_node *node)
>> +{
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 11:12 PM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Dec 6, 2023, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
> > As I understand things, this cannot be implemented (at the call site) for
> > nvptx, given that the callee's stack is not visible there: PTX is unusual
> > in that the concept of a "standard"
On Dec 6, 2023, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> As I understand things, this cannot be implemented (at the call site) for
> nvptx, given that the callee's stack is not visible there: PTX is unusual
> in that the concept of a "standard" stack isn't exposed.
Not even when one PTX function calls another?
Hi Alexandre!
On 2023-12-06T09:36:33+0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> FYI the newly added file libgcc/strub.c of this patch (aka commit
> r14-6201-gf0a90c7d7333fc )
> causes that nvptx does not bootstrap, failing with:
('s%bootstrap%build'.)
> ./gcc/as -v -o strub.o strub.s
> Verifying sm_30 code
Hi,
I am sorry for sending this late. I think the ipa changes are generally
fine. There are few things which was not clear to me.
> for gcc/ChangeLog
>
> * Makefile.in (OBJS): Add ipa-strub.o.
> (GTFILES): Add ipa-strub.cc.
> * builtins.def (BUILT_IN_STACK_ADDRESS): New.
>
Hi,
CC'd Thomas.
FYI the newly added file libgcc/strub.c of this patch (aka commit
r14-6201-gf0a90c7d7333fc )
causes that nvptx does not bootstrap, failing with:
./gcc/as -v -o strub.o strub.s
Verifying sm_30 code with sm_50 code generation.
ptxas -c -o /dev/null strub.o --gpu-name sm_50 -O0
On Dec 5, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> I intend to install this as part of the monster patch upthread.
I tweaked it a little further, so that exceptions don't mess with the
pattern counts, and extending the same anti-vrp measure to the other
strub-const tests, even though they weren't affecte
The recently-installed patch for interprocedural value-range propagation
enabled some folding that was not expected by the strub-const testcases,
causing them to fail.
I'm making the following adjustments to them to restore the behavior
they tested for, and to make them more future-proof to future
10 matches
Mail list logo