on 2019/6/17 下午9:44, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
>> on 2019/6/17 下午8:08, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On June 17, 2019 11:59:30 AM GMT+02:00, Segher Boessenkool
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:51:49AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> on 2019/6/17 下午8:08, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On June 17, 2019 11:59:30 AM GMT+02:00, Segher Boessenkool
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:51:49AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> >>>
> Hi Segher and
on 2019/6/17 下午8:08, Richard Biener wrote:
> On June 17, 2019 11:59:30 AM GMT+02:00, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:51:49AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>>>
Hi Segher and Bill,
Thanks a lot for your review comment
On June 17, 2019 11:59:30 AM GMT+02:00, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:51:49AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Segher and Bill,
>> >
>> > Thanks a lot for your review comments! I've updated the patch
>accordingly.
>> >
>>
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 10:51:49AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
> > Hi Segher and Bill,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your review comments! I've updated the patch accordingly.
> >
> > The updated one attached.
>
> OK. I suppose all low-overhead loop instruc
on 2019/6/17 下午4:51, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>
>> Hi Segher and Bill,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for your review comments! I've updated the patch accordingly.
>>
>> The updated one attached.
>
> OK. I suppose all low-overhead loop instructions use a decrement to zer
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Hi Segher and Bill,
>
> Thanks a lot for your review comments! I've updated the patch accordingly.
>
> The updated one attached.
OK. I suppose all low-overhead loop instructions use a decrement to zero
style iterator?
Thanks,
Richard.
Hi Segher and Bill,
Thanks a lot for your review comments! I've updated the patch accordingly.
The updated one attached.
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
index 91fafc4e766..6667cd03042 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c
@@
On 6/14/19 4:53 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi Kewen,
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 01:50:05PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> Comparing with the previous version, I dropped the checks
>> on costly niter and invalid stmt scanning. As Richard's
>> suggestion, keep this as simple as possible, refine
Hi Kewen,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 01:50:05PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Comparing with the previous version, I dropped the checks
> on costly niter and invalid stmt scanning. As Richard's
> suggestion, keep this as simple as possible, refine it
> if finding any cases which matter later.
I think
Hi,
Many thanks for all comments on previous versions.
Comparing with the previous version, I dropped the checks
on costly niter and invalid stmt scanning. As Richard's
suggestion, keep this as simple as possible, refine it
if finding any cases which matter later.
Bootstrapped and regression t
11 matches
Mail list logo