On 30/07/2024 22:39, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> v4 of patch 2/2 fixes a small mistake in 3 testcases, by relaxing the
> expected q0 as result register into q[0-9]+ to account for codegen
> differences depending on if the test is compiled with
> -mfloat-abi=softfp or -mfloat-abi=hard.
>
> I
Hi,
v4 of patch 2/2 fixes a small mistake in 3 testcases, by relaxing the
expected q0 as result register into q[0-9]+ to account for codegen
differences depending on if the test is compiled with
-mfloat-abi=softfp or -mfloat-abi=hard.
I repost patch 1/2 (already approved) so that Linaro CI can ap
ping?
On Mon, 9 Sept 2024 at 14:44, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> ping?
>
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 23:41, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > v4 of patch 2/2 fixes a small mistake in 3 testcases, by relaxing the
> > expected q0 as result register into q[0-9]+ to account for codegen
> > diffe
ping?
On Tue, 30 Jul 2024 at 23:41, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> v4 of patch 2/2 fixes a small mistake in 3 testcases, by relaxing the
> expected q0 as result register into q[0-9]+ to account for codegen
> differences depending on if the test is compiled with
> -mfloat-abi=softfp or -mfloat
Hi,
v4 of patch 2/2 fixes a small mistake in 3 testcases, by relaxing the
expected q0 as result register into q[0-9]+ to account for codegen
differences depending on if the test is compiled with
-mfloat-abi=softfp or -mfloat-abi=hard.
I repost patch 1/2 (already approved) so that Linaro CI can ap
