Hi Andrew, hi Jakub, hello world,
Andrew Stubbs wrote:
Compared to the previous v3 posting of this patch, the enumeration of
the "ompx" allocators have been moved to start at "100"
100 is a bad value - as can be seen below.
As Jakub suggested at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/202
Compared to the previous v3 posting of this patch, the enumeration of
the "ompx" allocators have been moved to start at "100".
-
This creates a new predefined allocator as a shortcut for using pinned
memory with OpenMP. The name uses the OpenMP extension space and is
intended to be consi
