Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] Add warnings of potentially-uninitialized padding bits

Ping. Thanks, Chris On 23/06/2025 14:48, Christopher Bazley wrote: Dear GCC Developers, I previously received comments from Joseph and Jakub, which I believe I addressed more than a month ago. Please could someone review version 4? Thanks, Chris On 21/05/2025 16:13, Christopher Bazley wro

Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] Add warnings of potentially-uninitialized padding bits

Dear GCC Developers, I previously received comments from Joseph and Jakub, which I believe I addressed more than a month ago. Please could someone review version 4? Thanks, Chris On 21/05/2025 16:13, Christopher Bazley wrote: Commit 0547dbb725b reduced the number of cases in which union pad

Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] Add warnings of potentially-uninitialized padding bits

Ping On 21/05/2025 16:13, Christopher Bazley wrote: Commit 0547dbb725b reduced the number of cases in which union padding bits are zeroed when the relevant language standard does not strictly require it, unless gcc was invoked with -fzero-init-padding-bits=unions or -fzero-init-padding-bits=all

Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] Add warnings of potentially-uninitialized padding bits

Dear GCC Developers, Please could somebody review this patch? I previously received comments from Joseph and Jakub, which I believe I have addressed. Thanks, Chris On 21/05/2025 16:13, Christopher Bazley wrote: Commit 0547dbb725b reduced the number of cases in which union padding bits are z

[PATCH v4 0/1] Add warnings of potentially-uninitialized padding bits

Commit 0547dbb725b reduced the number of cases in which union padding bits are zeroed when the relevant language standard does not strictly require it, unless gcc was invoked with -fzero-init-padding-bits=unions or -fzero-init-padding-bits=all in order to explicitly request zeroing of padding bits.