On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 3:15 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> Thanks! I tested a version of that code with glibc, and it works
> there too, so I've committed this patch after testing on
> powerpc-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu. Please let me know about any
> problems.
Well, that patch broke PPC 3
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 11:28 AM Sören Tempel wrote:
>
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > What I was hoping from my earlier question was that you could tell me
> > the exact lines to write in the current sources that will compile on
> > MUSL. Don't include , don't refer to earlier patches as
> > that
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> What I was hoping from my earlier question was that you could tell me
> the exact lines to write in the current sources that will compile on
> MUSL. Don't include , don't refer to earlier patches as
> that is what I tried to do earlier but failed, don't add new #define
>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 10:26 AM Sören Tempel wrote:
>
> Any updates no this?
>
> Sorry I keep bothering you with this but we are quite literally only a
> few lines away from having the go-signal.c code compile on PPC64 musl :)
>
> Let me know if you need more information to get this fixed.
What
Hi,
Any updates no this?
Sorry I keep bothering you with this but we are quite literally only a
few lines away from having the go-signal.c code compile on PPC64 musl :)
Let me know if you need more information to get this fixed.
Greetings,
Sören
Sören Tempel wrote:
> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Sorry, I guess I misread your patch.
No problem, I think this stuff is hard to get right and understand in
general since it is so poorly documented.
> What is the right standalone code for the PPC64 musl case? Thanks.
In order to have the current code (i.e. current go
On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 1:21 AM Sören Tempel wrote:
>
> Thanks for committing a first fix! Unfortunately, your changes don't
> work on ppc64le musl since you are now still using .regs on ppc64le the
> include of asm/ptrace.h (as added in the v1 of my patch) is missing.
> Hence, your patch fails to
Hi Ian,
Thanks for committing a first fix! Unfortunately, your changes don't
work on ppc64le musl since you are now still using .regs on ppc64le the
include of asm/ptrace.h (as added in the v1 of my patch) is missing.
Hence, your patch fails to compile on ppc64le musl with the following
error mess
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 9:41 AM Sören Tempel wrote:
>
> Ping.
>
> Would be nice to get this integrated since this one of the changes needed to
> make gccgo work with musl libc. Let me know if the patch needs to be revised
> further.
I went with a simpler solution, more verbose but easier to read.
Ping.
Would be nice to get this integrated since this one of the changes needed to
make gccgo work with musl libc. Let me know if the patch needs to be revised
further.
Sören Tempel wrote:
> The .regs member is primarily intended to be used in conjunction with
> ptrace. Since this code is not us
From: Sören Tempel
The .regs member is primarily intended to be used in conjunction with
ptrace. Since this code is not using ptrace, using .regs is a bad idea.
Furthermore, the code currently fails to compile on musl since the
pt_regs type (used by .regs) is in an incomplete type which has to be
11 matches
Mail list logo
