On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 06:57:40PM +0100, Sam James wrote:
> > /* No instruction can have more operands than this. Sorry for this
> > arbitrary limit, but what machine will have an instruction with
> > @@ -112,6 +113,8 @@ static int next_operand_number = 1;
> > struct operand_data
> > {
> >
Xianmiao Qu writes:
> With the increase in the number of modes and patterns for some
> backend architectures, the place_operands function becomes a
> bottleneck int the speed of genoutput, and may even become a
> bottleneck int the overall speed of building the GCC project.
> This patch aims to a
With the increase in the number of modes and patterns for some
backend architectures, the place_operands function becomes a
bottleneck int the speed of genoutput, and may even become a
bottleneck int the overall speed of building the GCC project.
This patch aims to accelerate the place_operands fun
