On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 2:06 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" writes:
> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 2:53 PM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" writes:
> >> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:42 AM Richard Sandiford
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> "H
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 2:05 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> "H.J. Lu" writes:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 8:31 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 4:19 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:56 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 2:53
"H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" writes:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 2:53 PM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" writes:
>> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:42 AM Richard Sandiford
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" writes:
>> >> > +to avoid stack realignment when expa
"H.J. Lu" writes:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 8:31 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 4:19 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:56 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 2:53 PM Richard Sandiford
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patc
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 8:31 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 4:19 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:56 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 2:53 PM Richard Sandiford
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" writes:
> > > > > On Mon
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 4:19 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:56 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 2:53 PM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" writes:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:42 AM Richard Sandiford
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:56 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 2:53 PM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
> >
> > "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" writes:
> > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:42 AM Richard Sandiford
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" writes:
> > >> > +to avoid stack
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 2:53 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" writes:
> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:42 AM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" writes:
> >> > +to avoid stack realignment when expanding memset. The default is
> >> > +@code{ge
"H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" writes:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:42 AM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" writes:
>> > +to avoid stack realignment when expanding memset. The default is
>> > +@code{gen_reg_rtx}.
>> > +@end deftypefn
>> > +
>> > @deftypefn {Target Hook} uns
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:42 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" writes:
> > +/* Callback routine for store_by_pieces. Read GET_MODE_BITSIZE (MODE)
> > + bytes from constant string DATA + OFFSET and return it as target
> > + constant. If PREV isn't nullptr, it has the
"H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" writes:
> +/* Callback routine for store_by_pieces. Read GET_MODE_BITSIZE (MODE)
> + bytes from constant string DATA + OFFSET and return it as target
> + constant. If PREV isn't nullptr, it has the RTL info from the
> + previous iteration. */
> +
> +rtx
> +builti
1. Replace scalar_int_mode with fixed_size_mode in the by-pieces
infrastructure to allow non-integer mode.
2. Rename widest_int_mode_for_size to widest_fixed_size_mode_for_size
to return QI vector mode for memset.
3. Add op_by_pieces_d::smallest_fixed_size_mode_for_size to return the
smallest integ
12 matches
Mail list logo