Victor Do Nascimento writes:
> On 1/5/24 11:10, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Victor Do Nascimento writes:
>>> The introduction of further architectural-feature dependent ifuncs
>>> for AArch64 makes hard-coding ifunc `_i' suffixes to functions
>>> cumbersome to work with. It is awkward to remembe
On 1/5/24 11:10, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Victor Do Nascimento writes:
The introduction of further architectural-feature dependent ifuncs
for AArch64 makes hard-coding ifunc `_i' suffixes to functions
cumbersome to work with. It is awkward to remember which ifunc maps
onto which arch featur
Victor Do Nascimento writes:
> The introduction of further architectural-feature dependent ifuncs
> for AArch64 makes hard-coding ifunc `_i' suffixes to functions
> cumbersome to work with. It is awkward to remember which ifunc maps
> onto which arch feature and makes the code harder to maintain
The introduction of further architectural-feature dependent ifuncs
for AArch64 makes hard-coding ifunc `_i' suffixes to functions
cumbersome to work with. It is awkward to remember which ifunc maps
onto which arch feature and makes the code harder to maintain when new
ifuncs are added and their su
