On 10/31/24 17:51, Kito Cheng wrote:
Could you add a test case for what you try to handle?
After carefully reviewing the code, I think this can be dropped in the
next revision.
The intuition of this patch is to handle both target and target_versions
specified in the attributes. But afte
Could you add a test case for what you try to handle?
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 3:15 PM Yangyu Chen wrote:
>
> To ensure that the target_version attribute is applied after target
> attributes.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc
> (riscv_option_valid_attribut
To ensure that the target_version attribute is applied after target
attributes.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc
(riscv_option_valid_attribute_p): Reapply target_version
attribute after target attribute
---
gcc/config/riscv/riscv-target-attr.cc | 13
