Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] MIPS vectorization improvements

2011-12-23 Thread Richard Henderson
On 12/23/2011 10:00 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Richard Henderson writes: >> On 12/22/2011 12:44 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: >>> Woah, thanks, that's quite some work. OK for the patches I didn't >>> respond to. >> >> Here's a combined follow-on patch that I believe addresses all of >> the com

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] MIPS vectorization improvements

2011-12-23 Thread Richard Sandiford
Richard Henderson writes: > On 12/22/2011 12:44 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> Woah, thanks, that's quite some work. OK for the patches I didn't >> respond to. > > Here's a combined follow-on patch that I believe addresses all of > the comments you had. > > Ok? Yeah, looks good, thanks. Richar

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] MIPS vectorization improvements

2011-12-23 Thread Richard Henderson
On 12/22/2011 12:44 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Woah, thanks, that's quite some work. OK for the patches I didn't > respond to. Here's a combined follow-on patch that I believe addresses all of the comments you had. Ok? r~ commit 824b5ca31ea21bb02cedabf79bb98e4348c34366 Author: Richard Hend

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] MIPS vectorization improvements

2011-12-22 Thread Richard Sandiford
Richard Henderson writes: > The second patch you've seen before, updated with your comments. > > The rest came from trying to reduce the number of tests failing > to be vectorized when compiling for Loongson. Eventually I just > had to stop though; the result is still quite a few pattern match >

[PATCH v3 00/10] MIPS vectorization improvements

2011-12-21 Thread Richard Henderson
The second patch you've seen before, updated with your comments. The rest came from trying to reduce the number of tests failing to be vectorized when compiling for Loongson. Eventually I just had to stop though; the result is still quite a few pattern match tests fail, but at least there are no