On Fri, Jun 16 2023, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:26:23PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 15 2023, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:06:43PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 6/5/23 10:18, Marek Polacek via
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:26:23PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jun 15 2023, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:06:43PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 6/5/23 10:18, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >> > Ping. Anyone have any f
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 15 2023, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:06:43PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6/5/23 10:18, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> > Ping. Anyone have any further comments?
>> Given this was approved before, but got reverted due to iss
On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:06:43PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 6/5/23 10:18, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Ping. Anyone have any further comments?
> Given this was approved before, but got reverted due to issues (which have
> since been addressed) -- I think you might as well go f
On 6/5/23 10:18, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
Ping. Anyone have any further comments?
Given this was approved before, but got reverted due to issues (which
have since been addressed) -- I think you might as well go forward and
sooner rather than later so that we can catch fallout ea
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 06:25:16PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hello, Marek,
>
> The patch looks good to me, and I'd have no trouble approving it if we
> were in stage1. Since we aren't, I'd prefer if we waited for another
> build system maintainer to give it a look, if i
Hello, Marek,
The patch looks good to me, and I'd have no trouble approving it if we
were in stage1. Since we aren't, I'd prefer if we waited for another
build system maintainer to give it a look, if it's to go in gcc-12. If
release managers feel I'm being overcautious, I don't mind if they
over
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 12:04:32AM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2022, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > gmp/mpfr/mpc/isl are DSOs I believe and therefore always PIC.
>
> They are *not* DSOs when built in-tree (see the use of --disable-shared in
> the relevant parts of Mak
