On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:51:16AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 1/17/24 01:33, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 06:10:55PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > Under what circumstances does it make sense for CLASSTYPE_INTERFACE_ONLY
> > > to
> > > be set in the context of module
On 1/17/24 01:33, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 06:10:55PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
Under what circumstances does it make sense for CLASSTYPE_INTERFACE_ONLY to
be set in the context of modules, anyway? We probably want to propagate it
for things in the global module so that
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 06:10:55PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Under what circumstances does it make sense for CLASSTYPE_INTERFACE_ONLY to
> be set in the context of modules, anyway? We probably want to propagate it
> for things in the global module so that various libstdc++ explicit
> instantia
