Re: [PATCH v3] bpf.2: Use standard types and attributes

Hello Daniel, On 5/17/21 8:56 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: On 5/16/21 11:16 AM, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote: Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar Discussion: Nacked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Nacked-by: G

Re: [PATCH v3] bpf.2: Use standard types and attributes

On 5/16/21 11:16 AM, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote: On 5/15/21 9:01 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: Some manual pages are already using C99 syntax for integral types 'uint32_t', but some aren't.  There are some using kernel syntax '__u32'.  Fix those. Both the kernel and the standard types a

Re: [PATCH v3] bpf.2: Use standard types and attributes

On 5/15/21 9:01 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: Some manual pages are already using C99 syntax for integral types 'uint32_t', but some aren't. There are some using kernel syntax '__u32'. Fix those. Both the kernel and the standard types are 100% binary compatible, and the source code differences

[PATCH v3] bpf.2: Use standard types and attributes

Some manual pages are already using C99 syntax for integral types 'uint32_t', but some aren't. There are some using kernel syntax '__u32'. Fix those. Both the kernel and the standard types are 100% binary compatible, and the source code differences between them are very small, and not important