On 10/26/22 12:33, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>
> Hi David.
>
> Thanks for the updates.
> OK for master.
>
Pushed, thanks.
Hi David.
Thanks for the updates.
OK for master.
>>> I'm not sure whether this behavior is a known limitation or an
>>> oversight. In my opinion it makes more sense to error at compile time,
>>> becuase even after the loader patches the return value it still will
>>> not be correct for these ca
>> I'm not sure whether this behavior is a known limitation or an
>> oversight. In my opinion it makes more sense to error at compile time,
>> becuase even after the loader patches the return value it still will
>> not be correct for these cases.
>>
>> So for now I've set these cases to error out,
