Thanks for the review, much appreciated. Agreed on all those points,
I'll remove it from -Wextra and just leave it as a standalone warning,
and I'll add those tests you suggested.
On 02/06/2025 19:08, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025, Peter Frost wrote:
Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025, Peter Frost wrote:
> Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-January/672568.html
This needs various coding style fixes. Lines should be broken before
binary operators such as && or || rather than after, and there should be a
space before '(' in function and macr
Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-January/672568.html
Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-January/672568.html
Missed the version 15 freeze with the last ping, I believe the project
is open for general development again now?
On 2/5/25 3:43 PM, Peter Frost wrote:
Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-January/672568.html
We're in regression fixes only phase of our development cycle. This
doesn't fix a regression, so it'll need to wait for the next development
window to open before it gets further at
Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-January/672568.html
v3 Patch:
* adds documentation
* fixes formatting
* minor code cleanup
Currently the behaviour of Wmissing-field-initializers is inconsistent
between C and C++. The C warning assumes that missing designated
initializers are deliberate, and does not warn. The C++ warning doe
