On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Great! Thanks.
>
> Could anybody please commit that?
Done.
Thanks.
> K
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Kirill Yukhin
>> wrote:
>>
>>> thanks. I've applied your inputs.
>>>
>>>
Great! Thanks.
Could anybody please commit that?
K
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
>
>> thanks. I've applied your inputs.
>>
>> Updated patch, ChangeLog, testsuite/ChangeLog are attached.
>>
>> Are they ok now?
>
>
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> thanks. I've applied your inputs.
>
> Updated patch, ChangeLog, testsuite/ChangeLog are attached.
>
> Are they ok now?
OK for mainline.
Thanks,
Uros.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hi,
> I've slightly updated mulx split to avoid ICE.
> Updated patch, ChangeLog entry (with Uros's contribution) and
> ChangeLog.testsuite entry are attached.
>
> Bootstrapped and make-checked.
>
> Tests all pass under simulator (expept one,
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> This is the third version of BMI2 support that includes generation of
> mulx, rorx, x part. This patch includes all comments on
> previous version, splits all insn post-reload, uses "enable" attribute
> and avoids new register modifiers. As a
Hello!
This is the third version of BMI2 support that includes generation of
mulx, rorx, x part. This patch includes all comments on
previous version, splits all insn post-reload, uses "enable" attribute
and avoids new register modifiers. As a compromise (see previous
posts), the mulx insn is now
