On 29/10/2024 09:39, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
On 28/10/2024 20:03, Robin Dapp wrote:
I'm not sure how this is different to just deleting the
zero-initializer, which is what I already tested and found some random
behaviour?
The difference is in the else-operand predicate. So unless there are
more
On 28/10/2024 20:03, Robin Dapp wrote:
I'm not sure how this is different to just deleting the
zero-initializer, which is what I already tested and found some random
behaviour?
The difference is in the else-operand predicate. So unless there are
more bugs we should only have added VCOND_EXPRs
On Tue, 29 Oct 2024, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> On 28/10/2024 20:03, Robin Dapp wrote:
> >> I'm not sure how this is different to just deleting the
> >> zero-initializer, which is what I already tested and found some random
> >> behaviour?
> >
> > The difference is in the else-operand predicate. So
> I'm not sure how this is different to just deleting the
> zero-initializer, which is what I already tested and found some random
> behaviour?
The difference is in the else-operand predicate. So unless there are
more bugs we should only have added VCOND_EXPRs for the cases where
they are absol
On 18/10/2024 15:22, Robin Dapp wrote:
This patch adds an undefined else operand to the masked loads.
@@ -4027,7 +4025,8 @@ (define_expand "mask_gather_load"
(match_operand: 2 "register_operand")
(match_operand 3 "immediate_operand")
(match_operand:SI 4 "gcn_alu_operand")
- (
This patch adds an undefined else operand to the masked loads.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/gcn/predicates.md (maskload_else_operand): New
predicate.
* config/gcn/gcn-valu.md: Use new predicate.
---
gcc/config/gcn/gcn-valu.md | 12
gcc/config/gcn/predicates.md |
