2024-08-13 15:53 Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 11:14:47AM +0800, Xiao Zeng wrote:
>> Thank you very much for the in-depth discussion between Jakub Jelinek and
>> jeff.
>> My knowledge is narrow, and I am not familiar with architectures other than
>> RISCV.
>> At the same time,
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 11:14:47AM +0800, Xiao Zeng wrote:
> Thank you very much for the in-depth discussion between Jakub Jelinek and
> jeff.
> My knowledge is narrow, and I am not familiar with architectures other than
> RISCV.
> At the same time, my understanding of libraries such as libc and
2024-08-07 23:15 Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
>
>On 8/7/24 8:55 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 08:46:11AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/7/24 1:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>>
This looks all wrong to me.
On all the other targets that already do support __b
On 8/7/24 8:55 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 08:46:11AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 8/7/24 1:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
This looks all wrong to me.
On all the other targets that already do support __bf16 type it is a storage
only type, so all arithmetics on it is expec
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 08:46:11AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 8/7/24 1:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> >
> > This looks all wrong to me.
> >
> > On all the other targets that already do support __bf16 type it is a storage
> > only type, so all arithmetics on it is expected to be done on f
On 8/7/24 1:16 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
This looks all wrong to me.
On all the other targets that already do support __bf16 type it is a storage
only type, so all arithmetics on it is expected to be done on float, not in
__bf16.
RISC-V has (via extensions) degrees of arithmetic/conversion s
On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 11:13:51AM +0800, Xiao Zeng wrote:
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * builtin-types.def (BT_COMPLEX_BFLOAT16): Support BF16 node.
> (BT_BFLOAT16_PTR): Ditto.
> (BT_FN_BFLOAT16): New.
> (BT_FN_BFLOAT16_BFLOAT16): Ditto.
> (BT_FN_COMPLEX_BFLOAT16_COMPLEX_BFL
2024-08-07 11:13 Xiao Zeng wrote:
The existing test cases 'gcc.dg/portal/float16 complex.c' for gcc are
already good, so no new test cases were added.
Of course, more test cases are always good, and if necessary, I will
supplement the test cases.
>
>gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * builtin-types.def
gcc/ChangeLog:
* builtin-types.def (BT_COMPLEX_BFLOAT16): Support BF16 node.
(BT_BFLOAT16_PTR): Ditto.
(BT_FN_BFLOAT16): New.
(BT_FN_BFLOAT16_BFLOAT16): Ditto.
(BT_FN_COMPLEX_BFLOAT16_COMPLEX_BFLOAT16): Ditto.
(BT_FN_BFLOAT16_COMPLEX_BFLOAT16): Ditto
