Evgeny Karpov writes:
> Wednesday, April 10, 2024 8:40 PM
> Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the updates and sorry again for the slow review.
>> I've replied to some of the patches in the series but otherwise it looks
>> good to
>> me.
>>
>> If you agree with the suggested changes then
Wednesday, April 10, 2024 8:40 PM
Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Thanks for the updates and sorry again for the slow review.
> I've replied to some of the patches in the series but otherwise it looks good
> to
> me.
>
> If you agree with the suggested changes then the series is OK for stage 1,
>
Evgeny Karpov writes:
> Hello,
>
> v2 is ready for the review!
> Based on the v1 review:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-February/thread.html#646203
>
> Testing for the x86_64-w64-mingw32 target is in progress to avoid
> regression due to refactoring.
Thanks for the updates and
On Thursday, March 7, 2024 9:48 PM
Evgeny Karpov wrote:
> > Changes from v1 to v2:
> > Adjust the target name to aarch64-*-mingw* to exclude the big-endian
> > target from support.
> > Exclude 64-bit ISA.
> > Update commit descriptions to follow standard style.
> > Rebase from 4th March 2024.
>
/actions/runs/8349019387
>
> Best regards,
>
> Radek Bartoň
>
>
> From: Radek Barton
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 10:05 PM
> To: Evgeny Karpov; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: richard.sandif...@arm.com; Richard Earnshaw (lists); Andrew Pinski
> (QU
PATCH v2 00/13] Add aarch64-w64-mingw32 target
Hello, everyone.
Currently, we are able to provide results of regression testing for
`x86_64-w64-mingw32` target with `--enable-languages=c,lto,c++,fortran` running
in WSL only.
The summarized results, both for the branch with patch set applied an
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024, Fangrui Song wrote:
LLVM has had an aarch64 mingw ABI support for a long time. Does this
patch series introduce a different ABI?
If yes, do you have a summary?
This patchset in itself does not reach ABI compatibility with the
preexisting aarch64 mingw ecosystem - but this
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 3:59 PM Fangrui Song wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 3:10 PM Evgeny Karpov
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Monday, March 18, 2024 2:34 PM
> > Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >
> > > I had a look at the v2 series, and besides a minor comment patch #8, ISTM
> > > than
> > > all the commen
On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 3:10 PM Evgeny Karpov
wrote:
>
>
> Monday, March 18, 2024 2:34 PM
> Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> > I had a look at the v2 series, and besides a minor comment patch #8, ISTM
> > than
> > all the comments your received about v1 have been addressed, indeed.
> >
> > > While unit
Monday, March 18, 2024 2:34 PM
Christophe Lyon wrote:
> I had a look at the v2 series, and besides a minor comment patch #8, ISTM than
> all the comments your received about v1 have been addressed, indeed.
>
> > While unit testing for the x86_64-w64-mingw32 target is still in
> > progress, the
Hello, everyone.
Currently, we are able to provide results of regression testing for
`x86_64-w64-mingw32` target with `--enable-languages=c,lto,c++,fortran` running
in WSL only.
The summarized results, both for the branch with patch set applied and its
corresponding base branch, show:
517501
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 21:48, Evgeny Karpov wrote:
>
> Monday, March 4, 2024
> Evgeny Karpov wrote:
>
> >
> > Changes from v1 to v2:
> > Adjust the target name to aarch64-*-mingw* to exclude the big-endian target
> > from support.
> > Exclude 64-bit ISA.
> > Rename enum calling_abi to aarch64_calli
Monday, March 4, 2024
Evgeny Karpov wrote:
>
> Changes from v1 to v2:
> Adjust the target name to aarch64-*-mingw* to exclude the big-endian target
> from support.
> Exclude 64-bit ISA.
> Rename enum calling_abi to aarch64_calling_abi.
> Move AArch64 MS ABI definitions FIXED_REGISTERS,
> CALL_REAL
Wednesday, March 6, 2024
LIU Hao wrote:
> May I suggest you keep the mcf thread model for aarch-w64-mingw32? I
> requested Martin Storsjö to test it on a physical Windows 11 on ARM machine
> with Clang and all tests passed. I think it should work once the GCC support
> is
> complete.
>
>
> --
>
May I suggest you keep the mcf thread model for aarch-w64-mingw32? I requested Martin Storsjö to
test it on a physical Windows 11 on ARM machine with Clang and all tests passed. I think it should
work once the GCC support is complete.
--
Best regards,
LIU Hao
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Descriptio
Zac Walker (13):
Introduce aarch64-w64-mingw32 target
aarch64: The aarch64-w64-mingw32 target implements the MS ABI
aarch64: Mark x18 register as a fixed register for MS ABI
aarch64: Add aarch64-w64-mingw32 COFF
Reuse MinGW from i386 for AArch64
Rename section and encoding functions fro
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config.gcc:
* config/aarch64/aarch64-opts.h (enum aarch64_calling_abi):
* config/aarch64/aarch64-protos.h
(mingw_pe_maybe_record_exported_symbol):
(mingw_pe_section_type_flags):
(mingw_pe_unique_section):
(mingw_pe_encode_section_in
Hello,
v2 is ready for the review!
Based on the v1 review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-February/thread.html#646203
Testing for the x86_64-w64-mingw32 target is in progress to avoid
regression due to refactoring.
Regards,
Evgeny
Changes from v1 to v2:
Adjust the target name
18 matches
Mail list logo
