Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

n 5/29/23 11:26, Arsen Arsenović wrote: Hi, NightStrike writes: Can you include texinfo in a top-level directory and have it built with the build, like you can with dejagnu? That's generally a decent path for building new gcc on older systems. Note that the Texinfo requirement wasn't bumped

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

Hi, NightStrike writes: > Can you include texinfo in a top-level directory and have it built with the > build, like you can with dejagnu? That's generally a decent path for > building new gcc on older systems. Note that the Texinfo requirement wasn't bumped, so nothing changed in this regard, h

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023, 14:00 Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Fri, 10 Mar 2023, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > > AFAIK we have not knowingly changed any specific requirements beyond the > > stated 4.7 and 4.9 for PDF output, but it concerns me that nobody is > > likely to be using versions that old on a regu

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

Richard Biener writes: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 8:00 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> >> On Fri, 10 Mar 2023, Sandra Loosemore wrote: >> > AFAIK we have not knowingly changed any specific requirements beyond the >> > stated 4.7 and 4.9 for PDF output, but it concerns me that nobody is >> > likely t

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 8:00 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Mar 2023, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > > AFAIK we have not knowingly changed any specific requirements beyond the > > stated 4.7 and 4.9 for PDF output, but it concerns me that nobody is > > likely to be using versions that old on a

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

On Fri, 10 Mar 2023, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > AFAIK we have not knowingly changed any specific requirements beyond the > stated 4.7 and 4.9 for PDF output, but it concerns me that nobody is > likely to be using versions that old on a regular basis to make sure > they continue to work and we hav

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

On 3/10/23 10:51, Sandra Loosemore wrote: On 3/10/23 01:50, Iain Sandoe wrote: Hi all, On 9 Mar 2023, at 23:35, Sandra Loosemore via Gcc-patches wrote: On 3/9/23 01:26, Richard Biener wrote: SLES 12 has texinfo 4.13a, SLES 15 has texinfo 6.5.  We still provide up-to-date GCC for SLES 12 bu

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

On 3/10/23 01:50, Iain Sandoe wrote: Hi all, On 9 Mar 2023, at 23:35, Sandra Loosemore via Gcc-patches wrote: On 3/9/23 01:26, Richard Biener wrote: SLES 12 has texinfo 4.13a, SLES 15 has texinfo 6.5. We still provide up-to-date GCC for SLES 12 but we can probably manage in some ways when

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

Hi all, > On 9 Mar 2023, at 23:35, Sandra Loosemore via Gcc-patches > wrote: > > On 3/9/23 01:26, Richard Biener wrote: > >> SLES 12 has texinfo 4.13a, SLES 15 has texinfo 6.5. We still provide >> up-to-date GCC for SLES 12 but we can probably manage in some ways >> when the texinfo requireme

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

On 3/9/23 01:26, Richard Biener wrote: SLES 12 has texinfo 4.13a, SLES 15 has texinfo 6.5. We still provide up-to-date GCC for SLES 12 but we can probably manage in some ways when the texinfo requirement gets bumped. OK, this seems to be the oldest version anyone admits to actually using. I

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

Sandra Loosemore writes: >> As an example, let's take this link: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-12.2.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html#index-Wpedantic >> This should place you below the item line this index entry refers to, >> and there aren't any copiable anchors (see equivalent in my render fo

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

On Wed, 8 Mar 2023, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > I personally do not know how the manuals for the GCC web site are built gcc.gnu.org has texinfo 6.5. (It's a RHEL 8.7 system.) > If we do update the version, there's a version check in configure.ac and > some hack for "makeinfo 4.7 brokenness" in doc

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 2:20 AM Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 5:09 PM Sandra Loosemore > wrote: > > > > On 3/8/23 14:22, Arsen Arsenović wrote: > > > > > > Sandra Loosemore writes: > > > > > >> On 3/8/23 02:11, Arsen Arsenović wrote: > > >>> Sandra Loosemore wr

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 5:09 PM Sandra Loosemore wrote: > > On 3/8/23 14:22, Arsen Arsenović wrote: > > > > Sandra Loosemore writes: > > > >> On 3/8/23 02:11, Arsen Arsenović wrote: > >>> Sandra Loosemore writes: > >>> > On 2/23/23 03:27, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote: > > I've r

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

On 3/8/23 14:22, Arsen Arsenović wrote: Sandra Loosemore writes: On 3/8/23 02:11, Arsen Arsenović wrote: Sandra Loosemore writes: On 2/23/23 03:27, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote: I've rerendered the updated documentation with latest development Texinfo (as some of the changes I m

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

Sandra Loosemore writes: > On 3/8/23 02:11, Arsen Arsenović wrote: >> Sandra Loosemore writes: >> >>> On 2/23/23 03:27, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote: I've rerendered the updated documentation with latest development Texinfo (as some of the changes I made for the purposes of

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

On 3/8/23 02:11, Arsen Arsenović wrote: Sandra Loosemore writes: On 2/23/23 03:27, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote: I've rerendered the updated documentation with latest development Texinfo (as some of the changes I made for the purposes of the GCC manual still aren't in releases) at:

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

Sandra Loosemore writes: > On 2/23/23 03:27, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote: >> I've rerendered the updated documentation with latest development >> Texinfo (as some of the changes I made for the purposes of the GCC >> manual still aren't in releases) at: >>https://www.aarsen.me/~arse

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

On 2/23/23 03:27, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote: I've rerendered the updated documentation with latest development Texinfo (as some of the changes I made for the purposes of the GCC manual still aren't in releases) at: https://www.aarsen.me/~arsen/final/ Ummm. I don't think GCC's d

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

Hi Thomas, Thomas Schwinge writes: > Hi Arsen! > > Thanks for caring about the documentation infrastructure! > > On 2023-02-23T11:27:09+0100, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches > wrote: >> The commit "docs: Reorder @opindex to be before corresponding options" > >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermai

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

Hi Arsen! Thanks for caring about the documentation infrastructure! On 2023-02-23T11:27:09+0100, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote: > The commit "docs: Reorder @opindex to be before corresponding options" > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-February/612616.html > His i

[PATCH v2 0/5] A small Texinfo refinement

Morning, (as said in ) This is a rebase + slight amendment of the previous patch series visible at: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/cover.1674777149.git.ar...@aarsen.me/ The commit "docs: Reorder @opindex to be before