On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 1:16 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 12:16 AM Sam James wrote:
> >
> > "H.J. Lu" writes:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 6:58 AM Siddhesh Poyarekar
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 2025-07-11 15:28, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > >> >> Why not just switch over
On Sun, Jul 13, 2025 at 12:16 AM Sam James wrote:
>
> "H.J. Lu" writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 6:58 AM Siddhesh Poyarekar
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2025-07-11 15:28, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >> >> Why not just switch over unconditionally? __fentry__ seems like a
> >> >> better alternative to
"H.J. Lu" writes:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 6:58 AM Siddhesh Poyarekar
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2025-07-11 15:28, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> >> Why not just switch over unconditionally? __fentry__ seems like a
>> >> better alternative to mcount overall and it has been around long enough
>> >> that even ol
effective_target_fentry): New.
--
H.J.
From 5d2e29e5c06f48ab56e24343ebfaebf1c5f2837f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H.J. Lu"
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 08:58:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86-64: Add --enable-x86-64-mfentry
When profiling is enabled with shrink wrapping, the mcount cal
