ly.
> This issue will be even worse when registers that depend on %rdx will
> be taken into account.
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780#c34
>
>
--
H.J.
From a113592b67afed33af189e14b6b071b62fa832d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H.J. Lu"
Date: Tu
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 9:31 AM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> Don't assume that stack slots can only be accessed by stack or frame
> registers. We first find all registers defined by stack or frame
> registers. Then check memory accesses by such registers, including
> stack and frame registers.
>
> gcc/
>
te: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 11:41:51 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86: Properly find the maximum stack slot alignment
Don't assume that stack slots can only be accessed by stack or frame
registers. We first find all registers defined by stack or frame
registers. Then check memory accesses by such regist
On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 3:32 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:14 PM H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> >
> > Don't assume that stack slots can only be accessed by stack or frame
> > registers. We first find all registers defined by stack or frame
> > registers. Then check m
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:14 PM H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Don't assume that stack slots can only be accessed by stack or frame
> registers. We first find all registers defined by stack or frame
> registers. Then check memory accesses by such registers, including
> stack and frame registe
Don't assume that stack slots can only be accessed by stack or frame
registers. We first find all registers defined by stack or frame
registers. Then check memory accesses by such registers, including
stack and frame registers.
gcc/
PR target/109780
* config/i386/i386.cc (ix86_u
