Re: [PATCH v2] rs6000: Fix issue in specifying PTImode as an attribute [PR106895]

On 10/3/24 2:24 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 06:21:48PM +0530, jeevitha wrote: >> PTImode assists in generating even/odd register pairs on 128 bits. When the >> user >> specifies PTImode as an attribute, it breaks because there is no internal >> type >> to handle this

Re: [PATCH v2] rs6000: Fix issue in specifying PTImode as an attribute [PR106895]

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 06:21:48PM +0530, jeevitha wrote: Hi! > The following patch has been bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux. Please send v2 patches as their own, new thread. Replies are for replies (duh), and for patch series. If you mix several versions in one thread things be

[PING^7][PATCH v2] rs6000: Fix issue in specifying PTImode as an attribute [PR106895]

Ping * 7 Please review! On 21/03/24 6:21 pm, jeevitha wrote: > Hi All, > > The following patch has been bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux. > > PTImode assists in generating even/odd register pairs on 128 bits. When the > user > specifies PTImode as an attribute, it breaks becaus

[PING^6][PATCH v2] rs6000: Fix issue in specifying PTImode as an attribute [PR106895]

Ping * 6 Please review! On 21/03/24 6:21 pm, jeevitha wrote: > Hi All, > > The following patch has been bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux. > > PTImode assists in generating even/odd register pairs on 128 bits. When the > user > specifies PTImode as an attribute, it breaks becaus

[PING^5][PATCH v2] rs6000: Fix issue in specifying PTImode as an attribute [PR106895]

Ping * 5. Segher, I've incorporated all the suggested changes. Are there any more changes required? Jeevitha On 21/03/24 6:21 pm, jeevitha wrote: > Hi All, > > The following patch has been bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux. > > PTImode assists in generating even/odd register pa

[PING^4][PATCH v2] rs6000: Fix issue in specifying PTImode as an attribute [PR106895]

Ping! Please review. Thanks & Regards Jeevitha On 19/06/24 6:12 pm, jeevitha wrote: > Ping! > > Please review. Are there any more changes required? > > Thanks & Regards > Jeevitha > > On 21/05/24 10:28 am, jeevitha wrote: >> Ping! >> >> please review. >> >> Thanks & Regards >> Jeevitha >> >>

Re: [PING^3][PATCH v2] rs6000: Fix issue in specifying PTImode as an attribute [PR106895]

Ping! Please review. Are there any more changes required? Thanks & Regards Jeevitha On 21/05/24 10:28 am, jeevitha wrote: > Ping! > > please review. > > Thanks & Regards > Jeevitha > > > On 17/04/24 2:44 pm, jeevitha wrote: >> Ping! >> >> I've incorporated all the suggested changes. Please r

Re: [PING^2][PATCH v2] rs6000: Fix issue in specifying PTImode as an attribute [PR106895]

Ping! please review. Thanks & Regards Jeevitha On 17/04/24 2:44 pm, jeevitha wrote: > Ping! > > I've incorporated all the suggested changes. Please review. > > Thanks & Regards > Jeevitha > > On 21/03/24 6:21 pm, jeevitha wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> The following patch has been bootstrapped and

[PING^1][PATCH v2] rs6000: Fix issue in specifying PTImode as an attribute [PR106895]

Ping! I've incorporated all the suggested changes. Please review. Thanks & Regards Jeevitha On 21/03/24 6:21 pm, jeevitha wrote: > Hi All, > > The following patch has been bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux. > > PTImode assists in generating even/odd register pairs on 128 bits. Wh

[PATCH v2] rs6000: Fix issue in specifying PTImode as an attribute [PR106895]

Hi All, The following patch has been bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64le-linux. PTImode assists in generating even/odd register pairs on 128 bits. When the user specifies PTImode as an attribute, it breaks because there is no internal type to handle this mode. To address this, we have cr