Hi!
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 04:40:42PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> I totally biffed the previous version of this patch, as it was built
> against an experimental tree instead of trunk. Trying again...
>
> Although safe_inc_pos avoids buffer overruns in rs6000-gen-builtins.c,
> there are some ot
Hi,
I totally biffed the previous version of this patch, as it was built
against an experimental tree instead of trunk. Trying again...
Although safe_inc_pos avoids buffer overruns in rs6000-gen-builtins.c,
there are some other routines where we fail to detect the possibility.
Clean those up!