On 2024-02-07 17:36, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 16:25, Torbjorn SVENSSON
mailto:torbjorn.svens...@foss.st.com>>
wrote:
Hi,
Is it okay to backport e39b3e02c27bd771a07e385f9672ecf1a45ced77 to
releases/gcc-13?
It would also need 807f47497f17ed50be91f0f879308
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 16:25, Torbjorn SVENSSON <
torbjorn.svens...@foss.st.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it okay to backport e39b3e02c27bd771a07e385f9672ecf1a45ced77 to
> releases/gcc-13?
>
It would also need 807f47497f17ed50be91f0f879308cb6fa063966
Please test with that as well, and OK for both if a
Hi,
Is it okay to backport e39b3e02c27bd771a07e385f9672ecf1a45ced77 to
releases/gcc-13?
Without this backport, I see this failure on arm-none-eabi:
FAIL: 23_containers/vector/bool/110807.cc (test for excess errors)
Kind regards,
Torbjörn
On 2023-11-09 02:22, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Th
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023, 01:17 Alexandre Oliva, wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2023, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > A single underscore prefix on __GLIBCXX_BUILTIN_ASSUME and
> > __GLIBCXX_DISABLE_ASSUMPTIONS please.
>
> That's entirely gone now.
>
> >> +do \
> >>
On Nov 8, 2023, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> A single underscore prefix on __GLIBCXX_BUILTIN_ASSUME and
> __GLIBCXX_DISABLE_ASSUMPTIONS please.
That's entirely gone now.
>> +do \
>> + if (std::is_constant_evaluated ())\
>> +static_asser
